Skip to content
EUAILaw.com
Articles / Annexes

Chapter I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Chapter II — PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES

Chapter III — HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IV — TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS

Chapter VIII — EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IX — POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE

Chapter XI — DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE

Annexes

Recitals →
Artificial Intelligence Act·Recital 42

Recital (42)

Recitals 42 / 180

In line with the presumption of innocence, natural persons in the Union should always be judged on their actual behaviour. Natural persons should never be judged on AI-predicted behaviour based solely on their profiling, personality traits or characteristics, such as nationality, place of birth, place of residence, number of children, level of debt or type of car, without a reasonable suspicion of that person being involved in a criminal activity based on objective verifiable facts and without human assessment thereof. Therefore, risk assessments carried out with regard to natural persons in order to assess the likelihood of their offending or to predict the occurrence of an actual or potential criminal offence based solely on profiling them or on assessing their personality traits and characteristics should be prohibited. In any case, that prohibition does not refer to or touch upon risk analytics that are not based on the profiling of individuals or on the personality traits and characteristics of individuals, such as AI systems using risk analytics to assess the likelihood of financial fraud by undertakings on the basis of suspicious transactions or risk analytic tools to predict the likelihood of the localisation of narcotics or illicit goods by customs authorities, for example on the basis of known trafficking routes.