Skip to content
EUAILaw.com
Articles / Annexes

Chapter I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Chapter II — PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES

Chapter III — HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IV — TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS

Chapter VIII — EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IX — POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE

Chapter XI — DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE

Annexes

Recitals →
Artificial Intelligence Act·Recital 163

Recital (163)

Recitals 163 / 180

With a view to complementing the governance systems for general-purpose AI models, the scientific panel should support the monitoring activities of the AI Office and may, in certain cases, provide qualified alerts to the AI Office which trigger follow-ups, such as investigations. This should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model poses a concrete and identifiable risk at Union level. Furthermore, this should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model meets the criteria that would lead to a classification as general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. To equip the scientific panel with the information necessary for the performance of those tasks, there should be a mechanism whereby the scientific panel can request the Commission to require documentation or information from a provider.