Skip to content
EUAILaw.com
Articles / Annexes

Chapter I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Chapter II — PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES

Chapter III — HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IV — TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS

Chapter VIII — EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

Chapter IX — POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE

Chapter XI — DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE

Annexes

Recitals →
Artificial Intelligence Act·Recital 128

Recital (128)

Recitals 128 / 180

In line with the commonly established notion of substantial modification for products regulated by Union harmonisation legislation, it is appropriate that whenever a change occurs which may affect the compliance of a high-risk AI system with this Regulation (e.g. change of operating system or software architecture), or when the intended purpose of the system changes, that AI system should be considered to be a new AI system which should undergo a new conformity assessment. However, changes occurring to the algorithm and the performance of AI systems which continue to ‘learn’ after being placed on the market or put into service, namely automatically adapting how functions are carried out, should not constitute a substantial modification, provided that those changes have been pre-determined by the provider and assessed at the moment of the conformity assessment.